Washington Times
“The Richest 1%”
December 18, 2002
So much for Republicans being the party of the wealthy. According to a new study by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive
Politics, that moniker more appropriately belongs to the Democrats. "Republicans raised more than Democrats from individuals
who contributed small and medium amounts of money during the 2002 election cycle," the report notes, "but Democrats far outpaced
Republicans among deep-pocketed givers." Among donors who gave more than $200 but less than $1,000, Republicans enjoyed a
substantial $68 million to $44 million edge over Democrats. The margin was closer among those individuals who gave $1,000
or more: The GOP took in $317 million, compared to the Democrats' $307 million.
But among the fabulously wealthy, the Democrats cleaned house. Donors of $10,000 or more gave $140 million to Democrats,
while only $111 million went to Republicans. Among those individuals who gave $100,000 or more, the Democrats raised $72 million
compared to the Republicans' $34 million. And when it comes to the millionaires' club - those kicking in $1 million or more
- the Democratic Party skunked the GOP, $36 million to $3 million. Needless to say, despite the near-parity in overall amounts
- $384 million to the Republicans vs. $350 million to the Democrats - the number of individual donors to the GOP exceeded
those to the Democratic Party by more than 40 percent.
In other words, in 2002 a select group of bigwigs dumped big money into Democratic causes, while a broad base of folks
donated respectable [but not overwhelming] amounts to Republican candidates. That goes a long way toward explaining the Democrats'
shallow support in the midterm elections, and should give an indication of which party's agenda has been hijacked by the big
money-men.
But it also sheds light on the president's first round of tax cuts - arguably the highest-profile domestic referendum
in the midterm elections. We can't help but notice that only those who are so stinking rich that money doesn't matter supported
the Democrats' opposition to tax cuts. Meanwhile, the many more who form the backbone of America's economy supported the Republicans. As the White House and congressional
Republicans prepare a new tax package, we hope they bear that in mind. And just to show that there are no hard feelings, we'll
still support tax cuts for the limousine liberals. With all that extra change in their pockets, maybe they'll put it to more
productive uses than propping up the rejected policies of the Democratic Party.
From www.rushlimbaugh.com
|
 |
|
|
 |

Democrats Get More Money From Rich
December 18, 2002
Another
myth about "the rich" has been shattered – namely the conventional wisdom that they are all Republicans – thanks
to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. A December 18, 2002 Washington Times editorial reports that donors giving "small and medium amounts" in 2002 overwhelmingly supported
the GOP, while "rich or deep-pocketed givers" hugely backed the Democrats!
Those
giving $200 to $999: GOP $68 million; Democrats $44 million. Those giving $1,000 to $9,999: GOP $317 million; Democrats $307
million. The "fabulously wealthy" donors of $10,000+ gave $111 million to the GOP – a whopping $29 million less than
the $140 million they lavished on the Democrats! Among those who gave $100,000+, the Democrats raised $72 million –
more than double the $34 million the GOP took.
"Yeah, Rush, but all those millionaires are Republicans." No, that's not a fact, my friends. The fact is that in the
2002 election cycle, those who gave a million dollars or more poured $36 million into the Democrat coffers, and a paltry $3
million into the pockets of the GOP. Again: millionaire donations went Democrat by a 12:1 margin! The two parties took in
about the same amount overall – GOP: $384 million; Democrats: $350 million. Just look at the Hollywood left, and you see where the big money goes.
In addition, the GOP attracted 40% more
individual donors! (George W. Bush set an all-time fund-raising record by collecting the most money from one-thousand-dollar
donors in the history of presidential politics.) Far more people giving small amounts exist as contributors to the Republican
Party - while Democrats skunked the GOP among the super-rich. That's no surprise, since nine of the twelve richest members of the United States Senate are Democrats.
We're going to put this up on our website homepage permanently, right alongside the story that the top 50% of wage
earners, those who make more than $26,000 a year, pay over 96% of all income taxes. (The IRS data) This myth that the Republicans are the party of the rich is breathing its last gasps, so we're giving
you these figures to help put it out of its misery for good. This is not a political commercial you have to disprove. These
are actual results of campaign contributions in just the 2002 cycle, which is why this class-envy garbage isn't getting the
traction it used to.
www.rushlimbaugh.com
|
 |
|
|